NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
URS FINAL DETERMINATION
NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD. v. Identity Protect Limited et al.
Claim Number: FA1412001593523
DOMAIN NAME
<nissan.repair>
PARTIES
Complainant: NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD. of Yokohama-shi, Japan | |
Respondent: none s domains of UK, United Kingdom | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
Registries: Lone Sunset, LLC | |
Registrars: Mesh Digital Limited |
EXAMINER
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
Neil Anthony Brown, as Examiner |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant Submitted: December 4, 2014 | |
Commencement: December 5, 2014 | |
Response Date: December 5, 2014 | |
Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the National Arbitration Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). |
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. |
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Clear and convincing evidence. |
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Procedural Findings: | ||
Multiple Complainants: No domain names are dismissed from the Complaint. | ||
Multiple Respondents: The Complaint does not allege multiple Respondents. |
Findings of Fact: Complainant is Nissan Motor Co.Ltd a global leading company of manufacturing, sales and related business of automotive products and marine equipment.Complaint has many international registrations of the NISSAN trademark and contends that the disputed domain name is identical to the NISSAN trademark, that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name and that the domain name has been registered and used in bad faith.Complainant has adduced evidence to support each of those contentions. |
URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.
[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
to a word mark: Determined: Finding for Complainant It is clear that Complainant has met its burden by clear and convincing evidence that the domain name is identical to the word mark NISSAN for which Complainant holds a valid national registration that is in current use. In response to the allegations made under URS 1.2.6.1 , Respondent has stated that "The domain is not required as this site is no longer active. Will transfer domain to complaining party as required." [URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Determined: Finding for Complainant It is clear that Complainant has met its burden by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent does not have a right or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name as Complainant has never licensed nor authorised Respondent to use the <nissan.repair> domain name, that Respondent had no rights in the name NISSAN, that Respondent is not commonly known by the domain name and that NISSAN has no affiliation with Respondent . In response to the allegations made under URS 1.2.6.2 , Respondent has stated that "The domain is not required as this site is no longer active. Will transfer domain to complaining party as required."
[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
Determined: Finding for Complainant It is clear that Complainant has met its burden by clear and convincing evidence: 1. It is inconceivable that the Respondent could have independently adopted this identical or confusingly similar name on its own. The Respondent rather must have been notified through TMCH system of NISSAN's trademark rights when registering <nissan.repair>, which is famous all over the world. 2.The Respondent has made no use of the domain in connection with any bona fide offering of goods or services in any commerce. The Respondent has not sold any goods or services under this name "NISSAN". Neither is the Respondent making any legitimate non-commercial nor fair use of this domain name. In fact, the possible website related to the domain name at issue doesn't exist, or it has been parked by the Registrar with a message " If you are interested in any of the available domains pointing to this website please email info@dohmains.co.uk ". In response to the allegations made under URS 1.2.6.3 , Respondent has stated that "The domain is not required as this site is no longer active. Will transfer domain to complaining party as required." FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. Respondent has alleged that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows:
In response to the allegations made under in the Complaint , Respondent has not adduced any evidence or made any submissions in opposition to the allegations, but has stated that "The domain is not required as this site is no longer active. Will transfer domain to complaining party as required."
DETERMINATION
After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing
evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
the duration of the registration:
|
Neil Anthony Brown
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page