NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
URS FINAL DETERMINATION
NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD. v. Customz et al.
Claim Number: FA1412001593526
DOMAIN NAME
<nissan.international>
PARTIES
Complainant: NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD. of Yokohama-shi, Japan | |
Respondent: Customz Steven McDaniel of Brookfield, WI, United States of America | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
Registries: Wild Way, LLC | |
Registrars: Godaddy LLC |
EXAMINER
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
Eleni Lappa, as Examiner |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant Submitted: December 4, 2014 | |
Commencement: December 5, 2014 | |
Response Date: December 19, 2014 | |
Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the National Arbitration Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). |
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. |
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Clear and convincing evidence. |
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Findings of Fact: The Complainant by clear and convincing evidence submits that it has secured more than 2,000 registrations for "NISSAN" trademarks worldwide. The domain name under examination <nissan.international> is identical to NISSAN's registered "NISSAN" trademarks. The Complainant has never licensed nor authorized the Respondent for use of "nissan.international" and "NISSAN" trademark. The domain name <nissan.international> was registered on April/25/2014 after the launch or the general available period. The Complainant asserts that the Respondent has made no use of the domain name in connection with any bona fide offering of goods or services and is not making legitimate non-commercial nor fair use of this domain name. The Respondent filed a reply on 12/19/2014 alleging that they have not made any attempt to profit from this domain name, and have no intentions of using it a manner harmful to the Complainant, however by retaining ownership of the domain name under review, the Respondent, who has no legitimate interest to the domain name <nissan.international>, maintain their ability to acquire undue profit from that domain name at any time. The Respondent further asserts that they contacted the Complainant’s representative/s and did not receive a response regarding the matter, however they did not provide any evidence to that end. Lastly the Respondent expressed their willingness to relinquish ownership of the domain name, however by reviewing the relevant WHOIS records, up until the date of the present determination, it is clear that this has not yet been done. |
URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.
[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
to a word mark: Determined: Finding for Complainant As per Rule [URS 1.2.6.1.i] the registered domain name is identical to a word mark for which the Complainant holds a valid national or regional registration that is in current use. [URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Determined: Finding for Complainant As per [URS 1.2.6.2] the Respondent/current Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name.
[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
Determined: Finding for Complainant As per Rule [URS 1.2.6.3.b] The domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith since the Respondent/current Registrant has registered the domain name in order to prevent the trademark holder or service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name and there is clear and convincing evidence that the Respondent/current Registrant has engaged in a pattern of such conduct. FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows:
The complaint submitted was not found to be filed in abuse nor it contained material falsehoods.
DETERMINATION
After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing
evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
the duration of the registration:
|
Eleni Lappa
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page