URS DEFAULT DETERMINATION
Deutsche Lufthansa AG v. WhoisGuard, Inc.
Claim Number: FA1605001676135
DOMAIN NAME
<lufthansa.press>
PARTIES
Complainant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG of Frankfurt, Germany | |
Complainant Representative: Rauschhofer Rechtsanwälte of Wiesbaden, Germany
|
Respondent: WhoisGuard, Inc. WhoisGuard Protected of Panama, II, PA | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
Registries: DotPress Inc. | |
Registrars: Namecheap |
EXAMINER
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
Carol Stoner Esq., as Examiner |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant Submitted: May 23, 2016 | |
Commencement: May 23, 2016 | |
Default Date: June 7, 2016 | |
Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). |
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. |
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Clear and convincing evidence. |
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Findings of Fact: [OptionalComment] |
Even though the Respondent has defaulted, URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to make a prima facie case, proven by clear and convincing evidence, for each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.
[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
to a word mark: Determined: Finding for Complainant Complainant has prevailed upon URS 1.2.6.1. (i). [URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Determined: Finding for Complainant Complainant has prevailed upon URS 1.2.6.2.
[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
Determined: Finding for Complainant Complainant has prevailed upon URS 1.2.6.3. (a); URS 1.2.6.3. (c); and URS 1.2.6.3. (d). FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows:
DETERMINATION
After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing
evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
the duration of the registration:
|
Carol Stoner Esq. Examiner
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page