URS FINAL DETERMINATION
Geoffrey, LLC v. Teresa Day et al.
Claim Number: FA1611001703027
DOMAIN NAME
<toysrus.shopping>
PARTIES
Complainant: Geoffrey, LLC of Wayne, NJ, United States of America | |
Complainant Representative: Blank Rome LLP
Megan E Spitz of Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
|
Respondent: Curt Craighead of Kerrville, TX, United States of America | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
Registries: SHOPPING Registry | |
Registrars: GoDaddy.com, LLC |
EXAMINER
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
Hector Ariel Manoff, as Examiner |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant Submitted: November 15, 2016 | |
Commencement: November 16, 2016 | |
Response Date: November 16, 2016 | |
Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). |
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. |
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Clear and convincing evidence. |
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Findings of Fact: The Complainant is a subsidiary of Toys “R” Us, Inc., a leading global retailer of toys, games, and numerous other consumer goods, operating several Toys “R” Us retail websites and over 1,800 stores worldwide. The Complainant is the exclusive owner of the "TOYSRUS" marks, used and registered in the United States and throughout the world for such goods and services and which are among the most recognizable and valuable brands worldwide. The complainant claimed that the domain name is comprised solely of “TOYSRUS,” identical to its widely-known TOYSRUS Trademarks for which Complainant holds numerous valid national and regional registrations worldwide and that are currently in use. The complainant claimed that Respondent has no legitimate right or interest on the domain name and the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. |
URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.
[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
to a word mark: Determined: Finding for Complainant The disputed domain name <toysrus.shopping> is identical to the Complainant’s Trademarks TOYSRUS. Examiner finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark registrations and that Complainant has complied with URS 1.2.6.1 by demonstrating that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a mark for which the Complainant holds a valid national registration which is in current use. [URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Determined: Finding for Complainant Complainant has not authorized Respondent to use its registered trademarks TOYSRUS. No evidence was submitted by Respondent in her Response to prove that she is commonly known as TOYSRUS. There is no evidence about rights or legitimate interest in TOYSRUS and the disputed domain name, or evidence about a fair use either. The Examiner finds that the requirements set forth by URS 1.2.6.2 have been also met.
[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
Determined: Finding for Complainant Since Complainant’s trademarks are prior to the disputed domain name’s registration, Examiner concludes that the registration of the disputed domain name (identical to a registered trademark) was made on bad faith. Respondent acquired the Domain for the purpose of selling it to Complainant. Examiner finds that the disputed domain name was registered in bad faith to attract for commercial gain and that Complainant has complied with URS 1.2.6.3. Respondent acquired the Domain for the purpose of selling it to Complainant. FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows:
DETERMINATION
After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing
evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
the duration of the registration:
|
Hector Ariel Manoff
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page