URS DEFAULT DETERMINATION
ZeniMax Media Inc. v.
Claim Number: FA2106001953301
DOMAIN NAME
<theelderscrolls.online>
PARTIES
Complainant: ZeniMax Media Inc. of ROCKVILLE, MD, United States of America | |
Complainant Representative: DLA Piper LLP (US)
Gregory C. Esau of Washington, DC, USA
|
Respondent: Lucas Papadimitriu of Dilbeek, Vlaams Brabant, II, BE | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
Registries: DotOnline Inc. | |
Registrars: Go Daddy, LLC |
EXAMINER
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
Ms. Kateryna Oliinyk, as Examiner |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant Submitted: June 29, 2021 | |
Commencement: June 30, 2021 | |
Default Date: July 15, 2021 | |
Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). |
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. |
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Clear and convincing evidence. |
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Findings of Fact: Complainant owns the trademarks and service marks related to the computer and video game programs and franchise titled THE ELDER SCROLLS®, including, inter alia, the following U.S. trademarks: - THE ELNDER SCROLLS, U.S. Reg. no. 1,943,732, registration date: Dec. 26, 1995, for ‘computer games’ in International Class 28; First use: March 01, 1994; In Commerce: Feb. 16, 1994; - THE ELNDER SCROLLS, U.S. Reg. no. 2,634,683, registration date: Oct. 15, 2002, for ‘providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users concerning computer games’ in International Class 28; First use: June 30, 1995; In Commerce: June 30, 1995; - THE ELNDER SCROLLS, U.S. Reg. no 3,375,520, registration date: January 29, 2008, for ‘Computer and video game user instruction manuals, books, and strategy guides’ in International Class 16; First use: April 2002; In Commerce: April 2002; - THE ELNDER SCROLLS, U.S. Reg. no 3,421,731, registration date: May 6, 2008, for ‘Clothing, namely, T-shirts, shirts, sweatshirts, fleece pullovers; headwear, namely, hats’ in International Class 25; First use: April 2005; In Commerce: April 2005; - THE ELNDER SCROLLS, U.S. Reg. no 3,584,564, registration date: March 3, 2009, for ‘ Pre-recorded CD's and DVD's featuring fantasy games’ in International Class 09; First use: March 20, 2006; In Commerce: March 20, 2006; - THE ELNDER SCROLLS, U.S. Reg. no 4,109,145, registration date: March 6, 2012, for ‘pre-recorded CDs and DVDs featuring music; Motion picture films featuring fantasy games’ in International Class 09; First use: May 01, 2002; In Commerce: May 01, 2002 (“TES Trademarksâ€) The first release in The Elder Scrolls series of games occurred in 1994 with major additional game releases in The Elder Scrolls series in 1996, 2002, 2006, 2011, as well as a massively multiplayer online role playing game (“MMORPGâ€) titled The Elder Scrolls Online, released in 2017. Complainant operates the official Internet web sites for The Elder Scrolls franchise at at <elderscrolls.bethesda.net> and for The Elder Scrolls Online MMORPG at <elderscrollsonline.com> (the “TES Websitesâ€). Consumers can access information about The Elder Scrolls series of games via the TES Websites. The Registrant of the domain name <theelderscrolls.online> is an individual without any affiliation to the Complainant. |
Even though the Respondent has defaulted, URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to make a prima facie case, proven by clear and convincing evidence, for each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.
[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
to a word mark: Determined: Finding for Complainant The Complainant provided documentary evidence that it is the registered owner of the word mark “THE ELDER SCROLLS†protected by a series of the U.S. trademark registrations, as well as documents to show that the trademark is in current use. The disputed domain name fully incorporates the Complainant’s trademark “THE ELDER SCROLLSâ€, written without spaces which are not allowed in domain names. The applicable Top Level Domain (“TLDâ€) in a domain name (e.g., “.comâ€, “.clubâ€, “.nycâ€) is viewed as a standard registration requirement and as such is disregarded under the first element confusing similarity test. The disputed domain name <theelderscrolls.online> is identical to the Complainant’s TES Trademarks. Therefore, the Examiner finds that the Complaint meets URS requirement of 1.2.6.1. [URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Determined: Finding for Complainant The Examiner determines that the Respondent is not commonly known by the “THE ELDER SCROLLS†name and that the Respondent has no connection or affiliation with the Complainant and has not received any license or consent, express or implied, to use Complainant’s TES Trademarks in a domain name or otherwise. The domain name <theelderscrolls.online> cannot be accessed because the following error occurred: Access Denied. Thus, the domain name <theelderscrolls.online> resolves to an inactive website which is not a case of bona fide offering goods or services. In the absence of any counter arguments and evidences in support of the Respondent’s rights and legitimate interest, the Examiner finds that the second element under URS Procedure 1.2.6.2 has been satisfied.
[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
Determined: Finding for Complainant Registering a domain name identical to a registered trademark, and subsequent passive holding of such a domain is viewed by the Examiner as bad faith. The Respondent has not submitted any evidences confirming circumstances listed in URS Procedure 5.7. In the absence of any defense which might have affected the decision on this issue, it is found that the third element of the policy under URS Procedure 1.2.6.3 has been satisfied. FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows:
DETERMINATION
After reviewing the parties submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing
evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
the duration of the registration:
|
Ms. Kateryna Oliinyk Examiner
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page