URS DEFAULT DETERMINATION
Philip Morris Products S.A. v. Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0160096233
Claim Number: FA2202001983010
DOMAIN NAME
<heetmeup.online>
PARTIES
Complainant: Philip Morris Products S.A. of Neuchâtel, II, Switzerland | |
Complainant Representative: DM KISCH INC
Andrew Papadopoulos of Sandton, II, South Africa
|
Respondent: Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0160096233 Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0160096233 of Toronto, ON, CA | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
Registries: DotOnline Inc. | |
Registrars: Tucows.com Co. |
EXAMINER
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
Vali Sakellarides, as Examiner |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant Submitted: February 3, 2022 | |
Commencement: February 4, 2022 | |
Default Date: February 21, 2022 | |
Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). |
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. |
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Clear and convincing evidence. |
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Findings of Fact: Complainant is the international tobacco company Philip Morris Products S.A., with products sold in over 180 markets worldwide. IQOS, an innovative reduced risk tobacco device, was launched in Japan, in 2014. Today due to extensive international sales, in accordance with local laws, the IQOS product is sold in around 66 markets. IQOS is an electronic heating device into which specially designed tobacco sticks (branded “HEETSâ€, “HeatSticks†or “TEREAâ€) are inserted and heated to generate a flavorful nicotine containing aerosol. Complainant asserts that “IQOS†and “HEETS†are not ordinary dictionary words or generic. Complainant owns numerous trademark registrations for the distinctive trademarks IQOS and HEETS, covering numerous jurisdictions, including International Registration HEETS (word) No. 692494, registered on 12th Sep 2016 (IR copy submitted - Exhibit A). Complainant also submitted Exhibit B, which is the Signed Mark Data issued by the Trademark Clearinghouse, which proves actual use of the trademark (URS Rule 8.1.2.1). The Disputed Domain, which was registered on 26 November 2020, is used for a website advertising and selling Complainant’s IQOS products, as well as unrelated third-party products. Complainant submitted Screenshot of the Defendant’s website, using the disputed domain name and stating on top “HEETSHOPâ€, as being an official endorsed dealer by the Complainant. Defendant is prominently using a mark highly similar / almost identical to Complainant’s HEETS trademark in the domain name, the registered HEETS trademark at the top of the website (where internet users usually expect to find the online shop’s name or website owner), and Complainant’s copyright protected product images and official marketing materials. The website reveals no information regarding the website provider’s identity, nor does it acknowledge Complainant as the real brand owner. This leaves internet users under the false impression that the website is owned by Complainant or one of its official licensees (Exhibit C - screenshots of the website). |
Even though the Respondent has defaulted, URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to make a prima facie case, proven by clear and convincing evidence, for each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.
[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
to a word mark: Determined: Finding for Complainant [URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Determined: Finding for Complainant
[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
Determined: Finding for Complainant FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows:
DETERMINATION
After reviewing the parties submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing
evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
the duration of the registration:
|
Vali Sakellarides Examiner
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page